Still, Patrick has racked up a number of environmental accomplishments in the past four years, backing and signing climate and "green communities" bills and forming a Clean Energy Center that provides financing and counsel to the state's fast-growing cleantech sector. Massachusetts' cleantech venture funding has risen more than 12-fold in a decade, higher than any state but California, according to a Pew Charitable Trusts report.
About the envestment...
Patrick remains committed to the system, but Baker gave a noncommittal assessment last week: "I'm willing to participate as long as it doesn't cost Massachusetts jobs and money ... I don't know if I'm against it or not. I view that as something that needs to be reviewed." Earlier this year, Baker said he didn't know whether climate change was human-caused. He later said that it was human-caused but added that he opposes cap-and-trade (it wasn't clear whether he meant a national system or RGGI).
http://www.grist.org/article/2010-massachusetts-governors-race
His Words:
“I’m willing to participate as long as it doesn’t cost Massachusetts jobs and money,” Republican gubernatorial candidate Charles Baker said during a morning appearance on WRKO. “I don’t know if I’m against it or not. I view that as something that needs to be reviewed.”
http://www.metrowestdailynews.com/news/x1350692386/Baker-Cahill-would-review-greenhouse-gas-pact
Charlie Baker

In my opinion, yes Patrick has been increasing the taxes and expenses in the last few years and Baker proposal sound really tentative in this manner. However, Patrick’s expenses are might been used for reasonable needs, while Baker’s words only transmit to the people the possibility of a chance to make a difference. For example, he would invest on the cleaning technology only if he had the money which by his proposal on the first place doesn’t seem likely.
ReplyDeleteSo what would you do? Expend your money on reasonable needs or don’t expend too much and don’t get as good results as you are expecting…